From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Baldwin County Comm'n

Supreme Court of Alabama
Nov 14, 2008
41 So. 3d 843 (Ala. 2008)

Summary

In Baldwin v. State Corporation Commission, 143 Kan. 580, 56 P.2d 453, the Supreme Court of Kansas, in discussing a joint operation between a private motor carrier and a rail common carrier, had this to say: "It clearly appears one of the main purposes of the act is to protect common carriers by rail and common carriers by motor vehicle alike in territory where there exists sufficient common-carrier service to adequately meet the public needs.

Summary of this case from McKay v. Utilities Com

Opinion

No. 1070586.

November 14, 2008.


Decisions of the Supreme Court of Alabama Without Published Opinions Affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Baldwin County Comm'n

Supreme Court of Alabama
Nov 14, 2008
41 So. 3d 843 (Ala. 2008)

In Baldwin v. State Corporation Commission, 143 Kan. 580, 56 P.2d 453, the Supreme Court of Kansas, in discussing a joint operation between a private motor carrier and a rail common carrier, had this to say: "It clearly appears one of the main purposes of the act is to protect common carriers by rail and common carriers by motor vehicle alike in territory where there exists sufficient common-carrier service to adequately meet the public needs.

Summary of this case from McKay v. Utilities Com
Case details for

State v. Baldwin County Comm'n

Case Details

Full title:State ex rel. Judy A. Newcomb, dist. atty., 28th Jud. Cir. v. Baldwin…

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Nov 14, 2008

Citations

41 So. 3d 843 (Ala. 2008)

Citing Cases

McKay v. Utilities Com

21 C. J. 1186, 1187, 1191. Magruder v. City of Redwood, 203 Cal. 665, 265 Pac. 807; Huron Portland Cement Co.…

Arkansas Exp., Inc. v. Columbia Motor Transport Co.

The Commission properly held that appellee will be a common carrier, and this holding is supported by the…