From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Baker

Supreme Court of Ohio
Sep 10, 2008
119 Ohio St. 3d 1444 (Ohio 2008)

Opinion

No. 2008-1094.

September 10, 2008.

Summit App. No. 23840, 2008-Ohio-1909.


APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. I, II, and III and cause consolidated with 2008-1304, State v. Baker, Summit App. No. 23840, 2008-Ohio-1909.

It is further ordered that briefing in this cause and 2008-1304 shall be consolidated. The parties shall file two originals of each of the briefs permitted under S.Ct.Prac. R. VI and include both case numbers on the cover page of the briefs. The parties shall otherwise comply with the requirements of S.Ct.Prac. R. VI.

The Clerk shall issue an order for the transmittal of the record from the Court of Appeals for Summit County.

Upon consideration of appellant's motion for appointment of counsel,

It is ordered by the court that the motion is granted. Donald Gallick of Akron, Ohio is appointed counsel for appellant.

PFEIFER, J., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. IV. O'CONNOR, J., would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. I only.

O'DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent.


Summaries of

State v. Baker

Supreme Court of Ohio
Sep 10, 2008
119 Ohio St. 3d 1444 (Ohio 2008)
Case details for

State v. Baker

Case Details

Full title:State v. Baker

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Sep 10, 2008

Citations

119 Ohio St. 3d 1444 (Ohio 2008)
2008 Ohio 4487

Citing Cases

State v. Sanders

{¶ 58} The State counters by arguing that under Ohio law neither the State nor the trial court is required to…