From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Baker

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Feb 11, 1988
519 So. 2d 1127 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Opinion

No. 86-2028.

February 11, 1988.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Osceola County; Cecil H. Brown, Judge.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Belle B. Turner, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Charles M. Willits, Daytona Beach, for appellee.


The state appeals from an order setting aside Baker's conviction for aggravated assault with a firearm, following a hearing on his motions for post-conviction relief. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850. The trial court found that Baker's trial counsel was sufficiently inept as to merit a new trial pursuant to Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). We disagree.

After carefully reviewing the record, we do not think the nineteen grounds asserted by Baker as demonstrating his counsel's inadequate representation constitute poor professional performance, or if a few grounds have facial merit, that any prejudice to Baker was demonstrated which affected the outcome of the trial. We also conclude no fundamental error occurred with regard to the trial court's imposition of a mandatory minimum sentence pursuant to section 775.087(2), Fla. Stat. (1985). Accordingly, we reverse the trial court's order and reinstate the sentence and judgment of conviction.

SHARP, C.J., and COBB and COWART, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Baker

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Feb 11, 1988
519 So. 2d 1127 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)
Case details for

State v. Baker

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT, v. WILLIAM HENRY BAKER, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Feb 11, 1988

Citations

519 So. 2d 1127 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)