State v. Bailey

Full title: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Tyrin BAILEY, Defendant/Appellant.

Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

Date published: Mar 25, 2014

425 S.W.3d 224 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014)

Opinion

No. ED 99428.

2014-03-25

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Tyrin BAILEY, Defendant/Appellant.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, 1122–CR01766–01, Thomas C. Grady. Andrew Edward Zleit, Missouri Public Defender Office, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant. Chris Koster, Attorney General, Gabriel Etter Harris, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, 1122–CR01766–01, Thomas C. Grady.
Andrew Edward Zleit, Missouri Public Defender Office, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant. Chris Koster, Attorney General, Gabriel Etter Harris, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before LISA VAN AMBURG, P.J., PATRICIA L. COHEN, J., and PHILIP M. HESS, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Tyrin Bailey (Defendant) appeals the judgment of conviction entered after a jury found him guilty of two counts of first-degree robbery and one count of armed criminal action. Defendant claims the trial court erred in denying his motion to sever the offenses.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).