From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Bagwell

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Feb 7, 1991
804 S.W.2d 800 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

No. 58017.

January 8, 1991. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied February 7, 1991.

APPEAL FROM CIRCUIT COURT, ST. LOUIS COUNTY; WILLIAM M. CORRIGAN, JUDGE.

Gerald M. Dunne, Daniel V. O'Brien, St. Louis, for defendant-appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., John P. Pollard, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff-respondent.


ORDER


Defendant appeals his conviction of the sale of a schedule I controlled substance.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).


Summaries of

State v. Bagwell

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Feb 7, 1991
804 S.W.2d 800 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

State v. Bagwell

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF MISSOURI, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. THOMAS BAGWELL…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three

Date published: Feb 7, 1991

Citations

804 S.W.2d 800 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991)

Citing Cases

Bailey v. State

This Court, for example, has already determined as a policy matter that application of Rule 61 to criminal…