From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Baggy

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Feb 1, 1890
10 S.E. 913 (N.C. 1890)

Opinion

(February Term, 1890.)

THIS was an appeal from the mayor of the town of Beaufort, tried before Bynum, J., at Fall Term, 1889, of CARTERET Superior Court.

The Attorney-General and Charles R. Thomas for the State.

No counsel for defendant.


The defendant was an itinerant dentist, and was indicted for practicing his profession without a license.


We are unable to see any cause for this appeal. No error is assigned, and, upon examination, we find the record regular and unexceptionable. In such a case the judgment will be affirmed. S. v. Freeman, 93 N.C. 558; S. v. Bell, 103 N.C. 438.

Judgment affirmed.

(691)


Summaries of

State v. Baggy

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Feb 1, 1890
10 S.E. 913 (N.C. 1890)
Case details for

State v. Baggy

Case Details

Full title:STATE v. G. K. BAGBY

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Feb 1, 1890

Citations

10 S.E. 913 (N.C. 1890)
106 N.C. 690

Citing Cases

State v. Freeman

No error. Affirmed. Cited: McCoy v. Lassiter, 94 N.C. 132; S. v. Bagby, 106 N.C. 690; S. v. Foster, 110 N.C.…

State v. Bell

No error. Affirmed. Cited: S. v. Bagby, 106 N.C. 690; S. v. Carter, 113 N.C. 640.…