From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Atkinson

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Sep 12, 1989
547 So. 2d 1262 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

No. 89-681.

August 16, 1989. Rehearing Denied September 12, 1989.

Appeal from the Division of Administrative Hearings.

Ken Muszynski, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Patricia Clare, Jacksonville Area Legal Aid, Inc., Cindy Huddleston, Florida Legal Services, Inc., Tallahassee, and Paulette Ettachild, Legal Services of Greater Miami, Inc., for appellees.


The Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services appeals an order of the Division of Administrative Hearings that held invalid in part proposed Rule 10C-1.113, Florida Administrative Code. The hearing officer found that the portion of the proposed rule which required the participation of teenage parents with children more than three months old in an employment and training program exceeded the agency's authority under section 409.029(8)(b), Florida Statutes (1987). Now the parties have brought to our attention the enactment of chapters 89-334 and 89-379, Laws of Florida, which authorize the portion of the proposed rule that was held invalid. The parties are in agreement therefore that this appeal is moot, but disagree as to the proper disposition of this cause. We find the appropriate remedy is to vacate the hearing officer's order and remand to the Division of Administrative Hearings for further appropriate proceedings, Mayo v. Florida Grapefruit Growers Protective Association, 123 Fla. 277, 166 So. 554 (1936).

BOOTH, JOANOS and MINER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Atkinson

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Sep 12, 1989
547 So. 2d 1262 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

State v. Atkinson

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Sep 12, 1989

Citations

547 So. 2d 1262 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)