Opinion
No. 20200092
05-07-2020
In the INTEREST OF A.T., Minor Child State of North Dakota, Petitioner and Appellee v. A.T., child, T.T., mother, Respondents and J.T., father, Respondent and Appellant
Nathan A. Wersal, Assistant State’s Attorney, Minot, N.D., for petitioner and appellee; submitted on brief. Kyle R. Craig, Minot, N.D., for respondent and appellant; submitted on brief.
Nathan A. Wersal, Assistant State’s Attorney, Minot, N.D., for petitioner and appellee; submitted on brief.
Kyle R. Craig, Minot, N.D., for respondent and appellant; submitted on brief.
Per Curiam.
[¶1] J.T. appeals from a juvenile court order terminating his parental rights to A.T. On appeal, J.T. argues the juvenile court erred in terminating his parental rights because its findings that A.T. was deprived and the deprivation was likely to continue were clearly erroneous. We conclude the juvenile court’s findings are supported by clear and convincing evidence, are not clearly erroneous, and support the termination of J.T.’s parental rights. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.
Lisa Fair McEvers
Gerald W. VandeWalle
Daniel J. Crothers
Jerod E. Tufte