"Judicial review of the sufficiency of the evidence to convict that would exclude evidence deemed inadmissible on appeal would unfairly prejudice the prosecution . . . it would be inappropriate for [an appellate court] to assess the sufficiency of the evidence based only on properly admitted evidence."State v. Billy Harold Arnold, No. E2000-03157-CCA-R3CD, 2002 WL 264615, at *2 (Tenn.Crim.App., Knoxville, Feb. 22, 2002) (citing State v. Longstreet, 619 S.W. 2d 97, 100-01 (Tenn. 1981)). The Defendant was convicted of one count of robbery.