From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Arnett

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Second District, Greene County
Nov 22, 2000
C.A. Case No. 2000 CA 65, T.C. Case No. 98 CR 348 (Ohio Ct. App. Nov. 22, 2000)

Opinion

C.A. Case No. 2000 CA 65, T.C. Case No. 98 CR 348

Rendered on November 22, 2000.

ROBERT K. HENDRIX, Atty. Reg. No. 0037351, Assistant Prosecutor, 45 North Detroit Street, Xenia, Ohio 45385, Attorney for Plaintiff-Appellee.

CHRISTA M. HOHMANN, Atty. Reg. No. 0068862, Assistant State Public Defender, 8 East Long Street, 11th Floor, Columbus, Ohio 43215-2998, Attorney for Defendant-Appellant.


OPINION


Jon P. Arnett is appealing the refusal of the trial court to grant him jail time credit for the 160 days he spent in the Franklin County Community Based Correctional Facility, his sole assignment of error.

As the State concedes in its brief, this issue has already been determined by this court in State v. Martin (Sept. 15, 2000), Greene App. No. 2000 CA 40, unreported. In Martin, we held that a defendant is definitely entitled to jail time credit for time spent in the Franklin County Community Based Correctional Facility. The decision of the trial court in this case not to grant such credit was made before our Martin decision was released.

The sole assignment of error is sustained.

The judgment is reversed, and the case is remanded to the trial court with instructions to grant Arnett jail time credit for the days he spent confined in the Franklin County Community Based Correctional Facility.

_________________________ FREDERICK N. YOUNG, J.

BROGAN, J. and FAIN, J., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Arnett

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Second District, Greene County
Nov 22, 2000
C.A. Case No. 2000 CA 65, T.C. Case No. 98 CR 348 (Ohio Ct. App. Nov. 22, 2000)
Case details for

State v. Arnett

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JON PAUL ARNETT, Defendant-Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of Ohio, Second District, Greene County

Date published: Nov 22, 2000

Citations

C.A. Case No. 2000 CA 65, T.C. Case No. 98 CR 348 (Ohio Ct. App. Nov. 22, 2000)