From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Armstrong

Supreme Court of Washington.
Jun 1, 2016
185 Wn. 2d 1028 (Wash. 2016)

Opinion

NO. 92689–1

06-01-2016

State of Washington, Respondent, v. Michael Eric Armstrong, Petitioner.


ORDER

¶ 1 Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Madsen and Justices Johnson, Fairhurst, Wiggins, and Gordon McCloud, considered at its May 31, 2016, Motion Calendar, whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b), and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That the Petition for Review is denied.

For the Court

/s/ Madsen, C.J.

CHIEF JUSTICE


Summaries of

State v. Armstrong

Supreme Court of Washington.
Jun 1, 2016
185 Wn. 2d 1028 (Wash. 2016)
Case details for

State v. Armstrong

Case Details

Full title:State of Washington, Respondent, v. Michael Eric Armstrong, Petitioner.

Court:Supreme Court of Washington.

Date published: Jun 1, 2016

Citations

185 Wn. 2d 1028 (Wash. 2016)
185 Wn. 2d 1028
185 Wash. 2d 1028