From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Armstrong

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Oct 20, 1992
838 S.W.2d 521 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

No. 60924.

October 20, 1992.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS; A.J. SEIER, JUDGE.

Emily Blood, St. Louis, for defendant/appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Hugh L. Marshall, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff/respondent.


ORDER


Defendant was convicted by a jury of forcible rape and forcible sodomy, and sentenced by the court as a persistent misdemeanor offender to concurrent prison terms of twenty-five years. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).


Summaries of

State v. Armstrong

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Oct 20, 1992
838 S.W.2d 521 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

State v. Armstrong

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF MISSOURI, PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT, v. KEITH ARMSTRONG…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Oct 20, 1992

Citations

838 S.W.2d 521 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992)