State v. Aranda

3 Citing cases

  1. State v. Miesbauer

    334 Or. App. 403 (Or. Ct. App. 2024)

    At trial, defendant objected to the admission of those records on the ground that, under OEC 403, their probative value was substantially outweighed by the risk of prejudice. The trial court, relying on this court's then-recent decision in State v. Aranda, 319 Or.App. 178, 509 P.3d 152 (2022), rev'd, 372 Or 363, ___ P.3d ___ (2024), engaged in OEC 403 balancing before admitting the evidence. On appeal, defendant argues that the court correctly identified the need to balance but “went astray with respect to the scope of OEC 403 balancing” under our Aranda decision.

  2. State v. Dehaven

    333 Or. App. 389 (Or. Ct. App. 2024)   Cited 1 times

    After this case was submitted, the Oregon Supreme Court issued State v. Aranda, 372 Or. 363, 406, ___ P.3d ___ (2024), in which the court held that due process does not require a trial court to engage in OEC 403 balancing when determining the admissibility of evidence under OEC 609. Although the Supreme Court acknowledged that a "defendant's right to due process overrides any state rule of criminal procedure that would render his trial fundamentally unfair," the application of that standard is not governed by OEC 403's balancing test.

  3. State v. White

    372 Or. 763 (Or. 2024)

    The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated, and this case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of State v. Aranda, 372 Or 363, 550 P.3d 363 (2024).