From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Anne Seabrook

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Dec 31, 2019
2019-UP-409 (S.C. Ct. App. Dec. 31, 2019)

Opinion

2019-UP-409

12-31-2019

The State, Respondent, v. Katherine Lathara Anne Seabrook, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2018-000644

Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted November 1, 2019

Appeal From Charleston County J. C. Nicholson, Jr., Circuit Court Judge.

Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

LOCKEMY, C.J., and KONDUROS and HILL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Anne Seabrook

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Dec 31, 2019
2019-UP-409 (S.C. Ct. App. Dec. 31, 2019)
Case details for

State v. Anne Seabrook

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Katherine Lathara Anne Seabrook, Appellant…

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Dec 31, 2019

Citations

2019-UP-409 (S.C. Ct. App. Dec. 31, 2019)