From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Anderson

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
Sep 7, 2018
NO. 2018 KW 1239 (La. Ct. App. Sep. 7, 2018)

Opinion

NO. 2018 KW 1239

09-07-2018

STATE OF LOUISIANA v. KYLE ANDERSON


In Re: Kyle Anderson, applying for supervisory writs, 22nd Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Tammany, No. 593,531. BEFORE: PETTIGREW, WELCH, AND CHUTZ, JJ.

WRIT GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. After reviewing the three videos, we do not find them to be relevant, and even if they are relevant, we find that the prejudice would outweigh any probative value. Further, the videos do not qualify as admissible evidence under La. Code Evid. art. 404(B). With regard to the photograph, the writ application is denied.

JTP

JEW

Chutz, J., dissents and would deny the writ application. COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT /s/_________

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT


Summaries of

State v. Anderson

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
Sep 7, 2018
NO. 2018 KW 1239 (La. Ct. App. Sep. 7, 2018)
Case details for

State v. Anderson

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF LOUISIANA v. KYLE ANDERSON

Court:STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

Date published: Sep 7, 2018

Citations

NO. 2018 KW 1239 (La. Ct. App. Sep. 7, 2018)