From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Anderson

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Sep 13, 1994
883 S.W.2d 112 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

Nos. 63471, 64845.

September 13, 1994.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT, ST. LOUIS COUNTY; HARRY J. STUSSIE, JUDGE.

Ellen H. Flottman, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John R. Watson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CRANE, P.J., and CRIST and CRANDALL, JJ.


ORDER


Defendant appeals after a jury convicted him of first degree burglary and stealing over $150, and the motion court denied his Rule 29.15 motion. We affirm. We find the findings of fact issued by the motion court are not clearly erroneous and no error of law appears. Rule 84.16(b)(2) and (5). Further, we find no precedential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an extended opinion and affirm by written order. Rule 30.25(b); Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision has been issued to the parties for their use only.


Summaries of

State v. Anderson

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Sep 13, 1994
883 S.W.2d 112 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994)
Case details for

State v. Anderson

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT v. JAMES C. ANDERSON, APPELLANT. JAMES C…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three

Date published: Sep 13, 1994

Citations

883 S.W.2d 112 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994)