From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Amaro

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jun 30, 2000
762 So. 2d 998 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

Nos. 5D99-2113 5D99-2284

Opinion filed June 30, 2000 JANUARY TERM 2000

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Osceola County, Reginald K. Whitehead, Judge.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Ann M. Phillips, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellant/Cross-Appellee.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Brynn Newton, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellee/Cross-Appellant.


The State appeals the sentence imposed on the defendant arguing that the trial judge applied an invalid reason for the downward departure. The defendant cross-appeals the lower court's order revoking his community control.

The defendant was charged with two counts of capital sexual battery and two counts of a lewd act upon a child. Pursuant to a plea offer from the State, the defendant pled nolo contendere to three counts of a lewd act upon a child. The State dismissed the other counts, and the defendant was sentenced to two years of community control followed by five years of probation. A condition of his community control required that the defendant have no contact with children under the age of sixteen unless supervised by an adult approved by the judge or his community control officer. He was also required to successfully complete a sex offender treatment program.

About one month later, the defendant was charged with violating his community control after his community control officer discovered children at his home during a routine visit. The trial judge heard the evidence and testimony and found that the defendant wilfully violated his community control. The caretaker of the victim, who appears from the record to also be the victim's grandmother, told the trial judge that she did not want the defendant to go to jail. The trial judge used this request as a reason to impose a sentence below the minimum required under the guidelines. The State objected to the downward departure.

We find that the evidence was sufficient to find that the defendant violated his community control. Therefore, we affirm the order revoking his community control. However, we also find that the wishes of the victim's grandmother that the defendant not go to jail are not a sufficient reason for a downward departure sentence. See State v. Skidmore, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D1826 (Fla. 4th DCA Aug. 4, 1999). We therefore reverse the sentence and remand this case to the trial court for imposition of a guidelines sentence.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED.

THOMPSON, C.J., and DAUKSCH, J., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Amaro

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jun 30, 2000
762 So. 2d 998 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

State v. Amaro

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. FELIX MANUEL AMARO…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Jun 30, 2000

Citations

762 So. 2d 998 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Citing Cases

State v. Thompkins

See Henderson, 108 So.3d at 1141 (“The fact that a defendant has a minor child requiring care and support has…