From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Alonzo

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO
Oct 5, 2016
Docket No. 44158 (Idaho Ct. App. Oct. 5, 2016)

Opinion

Docket No. 44158 2016 Unpublished Opinion No. 720

10-05-2016

STATE OF IDAHO, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. DANIEL JESUS ALONZO JR., Defendant-Appellant.

Eric D. Fredericksen, Interim State Appellate Public Defender; Jenny C. Swinford, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.


Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fifth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Twin Falls County. Hon. Randy J. Stoker, District Judge. Appeal from judgment of conviction and unified sentence of eight years, with a minimum period of confinement of four years, for felony injury to a child, dismissed. Eric D. Fredericksen, Interim State Appellate Public Defender; Jenny C. Swinford, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent. Before MELANSON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge; and GRATTON, Judge

____________________

PER CURIAM

Daniel Jesus Alonzo, Jr. pled guilty to felony injury to a child. I.C. §§ 18-1501(1), 18-112A. The parties entered into a binding Idaho Criminal Rule 11 plea agreement. Pursuant to the plea agreement, Alonzo waived his right to file a Rule 35 motion regarding the initial judgment and to appeal any issues including all matters involving the plea or his sentence. The district court sentenced Alonzo to a unified term of eight years with four years determinate and retained jurisdiction. Following the period of retained jurisdiction, the district court relinquished jurisdiction. Alonzo filed an I.C.R. 35 motion for reconsideration of his sentence, which the district court denied. Alonzo appeals asserting that the district court abused its discretion by denying his Rule 35 motion.

We hold that Alonzo's appellate challenge to the denial of the Rule 35 motion has been waived by his plea agreement. See I.C.R. 11(f)(1); State v. Rodriguez, 142 Idaho 786, 787, 133 P.3d 1251, 1252 (Ct. App. 2006). Alonzo's plea agreement contained a clause by which Alonzo waived his right to file a Rule 35 motion. Accordingly, we dismiss Alonzo's appeal.


Summaries of

State v. Alonzo

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO
Oct 5, 2016
Docket No. 44158 (Idaho Ct. App. Oct. 5, 2016)
Case details for

State v. Alonzo

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF IDAHO, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. DANIEL JESUS ALONZO JR.…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Date published: Oct 5, 2016

Citations

Docket No. 44158 (Idaho Ct. App. Oct. 5, 2016)