From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Allison

Supreme Court of Hawaii
Dec 15, 2003
25658 (Haw. Dec. 15, 2003)

Opinion

25658

December 15, 2003.

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT (HPD Cr. No. 02488390)

On the briefs:

Daniel H. Shimizu, deputy prosecuting attorney, for plaintiff-appellee.

Steven M. Shaw, for defendant-appellant.


SUMMARY DISPOSITION ORDER


The defendant-appellant Peter M. Allison appeals from the October 9, 2003 judgment of conviction and sentence of the district court of the first circuit, the Honorable George Y. Kimura presiding, convicting him of and sentencing him for the offense of harassment, in violation of Hawai`i Revised Statutes § 711-1106(1)(1) (Supp. 2002). On appeal, Allison argues, inter alia, that: (1) the district court violated his due process rights to argue for discovery and for access to witnesses under the fourteenth amendment of the United States Constitution and article I, section 5 of the Hawai`i Constitution; (2) the district court violated his right to counsel under the sixth amendment to the United States Constitution and article I, section 14 of the Hawai`i Constitution; (3) the district court judge denied his right to due process of law under the fourteenth amendment to the United States Constitution and article I, section 5 of the Hawai`i Constitution, by failure to voluntarily recuse himself; and (4) his right to an impartial judge guaranteed under the fourteenth amendment to the United States Constitution and the due process clause of the Hawai`i Constitution was violated by Judge Kimura's detailed and unduly extensive examination of the complainant and was plain error despite lack of objection.

Upon careful review of the record and the briefs submitted by the parties, it appears that the State concedes that Allison was insufficiently advised concerning waiver of the right to counsel. See State v. Dowler, 80 Haw. 246, 909 P.2d 574 (App. 1995); State v. Dickson, 4 Haw. App. 614, 673 P.2d 1036 (1983). We hold that the State's confession of error is supported by the record and is well-founded in law. See State v. Wasson, 76 Haw. 415, 879 P.2d 520, 523 (1994); Territory v. Kogami, 37 Haw. 174, 175 (1945). Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Allison's conviction of and sentence for harassment is vacated and the case is remanded for a new trial.


Summaries of

State v. Allison

Supreme Court of Hawaii
Dec 15, 2003
25658 (Haw. Dec. 15, 2003)
Case details for

State v. Allison

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF HAWAI`I, Plaintiff-Appellee v. PETER M. ALLISON…

Court:Supreme Court of Hawaii

Date published: Dec 15, 2003

Citations

25658 (Haw. Dec. 15, 2003)