From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Allen

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Sep 29, 2015
471 S.W.3d 396 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015)

Opinion

WD 77798

09-29-2015

State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Samuel Nathaniel Allen, Appellant.

Daniel N. McPherson, Jefferson City, for Respondent Emmett D. Queener, Columbia, for Appellant


Daniel N. McPherson, Jefferson City, for Respondent

Emmett D. Queener, Columbia, for Appellant

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Samuel Allen appeals his convictions for tampering in the first degree, section 569.080, RSMoCum. Supp. 2013, and resisting arrest, section 575.150, RSMoCum. Supp. 2013, and concurrent sentences of ten years and five years imprisonment, respectively. He contends that the trial court abused its discretion in denying his motion to sever the count of resisting arrest from the counts of burglary and tampering. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment of convictions is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).


Summaries of

State v. Allen

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Sep 29, 2015
471 S.W.3d 396 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015)
Case details for

State v. Allen

Case Details

Full title:State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Samuel Nathaniel Allen, Appellant.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Sep 29, 2015

Citations

471 S.W.3d 396 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015)

Citing Cases

Allen v. State

This court affirmed Allen's convictions and sentences in a per curiam order and memorandum issued pursuant to…