From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Aldrich

Oregon Court of Appeals
Aug 8, 2001
29 P.3d 1170 (Or. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

94CR01901TM; A85846

Submitted on remand May 11, 2001.

Filed: August 8, 2001

On remand from the Oregon Supreme Court, State v. Aldrich, 331 Or. 696, 21 P.3d 1088 (2001).

Appeal from Circuit Court, Deschutes County. Alta J. Brady, Judge.

David E. Groom, Public Defender, and Eric R. Johansen, Deputy Public Defender, for appellant.

Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General, and Janet A. Klapstein, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Before HASELTON, Presiding Judge, and DEITS, Chief Judge, and WOLLHEIM, Judge.


PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded.


This case is before us on remand from the Supreme Court for reconsideration in light of its decision in State v. Fleetwood, 331 Or. 511, 16 P.3d 503 (2000). We have concluded in the case of a codefendant of this defendant that the error in erroneously admitting audio recordings was not harmless. State v. McCain, 175 Or. App. 274, 28 P.3d 641 (July 5, 2001). For the same reasons that we concluded that the error was not harmless as to the codefendant, we conclude that the error was not harmless as to defendant.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

State v. Aldrich

Oregon Court of Appeals
Aug 8, 2001
29 P.3d 1170 (Or. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

State v. Aldrich

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. DOUGLAS EUGENE ALDRICH, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Aug 8, 2001

Citations

29 P.3d 1170 (Or. Ct. App. 2001)
29 P.3d 1170

Citing Cases

State v. Jury

Although the body-wire issue was preserved in those cases, unlike here, we decline to treat defendant…