From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Alaniz

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
May 3, 2016
NUMBER 13-15-00554-CR (Tex. App. May. 3, 2016)

Opinion

NUMBER 13-15-00554-CR

05-03-2016

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant, v. JAVIER BONIFACIO BARRERA ALANIZ, Appellee.


On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 8 of Hidalgo County, Texas.

ORDER ABATING APPEAL

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza
OrderPer Curiam

Appellee's counsel, Johnathan Ball, has filed a motion requesting to withdraw as counsel. According to his motion to withdraw, good cause exists for him to withdraw because he is now employed by the Hidalgo County District Attorney's Office as the Border Crimes Unit prosecutor.

Adequate reason for the discharge of counsel and appointment of new counsel rests within the sound discretion of the trial court. Carroll v. State, 176 S.W.3d 249, 255 (Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 2004, pet. ref'd). In those circumstances where the appointment of substitute counsel may be necessary, an appellate court, when faced with a motion to withdraw, should abate the proceeding to the trial court for determination of this issue. Accordingly, we ABATE the appeal and REMAND the cause to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this order.

Upon remand, the trial court shall determine whether appellee's court-appointed attorney should remain as appellee's counsel; and, if not, whether appellee is entitled to new appointed counsel. If the trial court determines that there is no reason to discharge appellee's current appointed attorney and appoint substitute counsel, the court shall enter an order to that effect. If the trial court determines that new counsel should be appointed, the name, address, telephone number, email address, and state bar number of the newly appointed counsel shall be included in the order appointing counsel. The trial court shall further cause its order to be included in a supplemental clerk's record to be filed with the Clerk of this Court on or before the expiration of ten days from the date of this order.

It is so ordered.

PER CURIAM Do not publish.
TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). Delivered and filed the 3rd day of May, 2016.


Summaries of

State v. Alaniz

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
May 3, 2016
NUMBER 13-15-00554-CR (Tex. App. May. 3, 2016)
Case details for

State v. Alaniz

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant, v. JAVIER BONIFACIO BARRERA ALANIZ…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

Date published: May 3, 2016

Citations

NUMBER 13-15-00554-CR (Tex. App. May. 3, 2016)