From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Adams

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
Apr 18, 2017
NO. 2017 KW 0169 (La. Ct. App. Apr. 18, 2017)

Opinion

NO. 2017 KW 0169

04-18-2017

STATE OF LOUISIANA v. LAKEISHA SHANAE ADAMS


In Re: LaKeisha Shanae Adams, applying for supervisory writs, 22nd Judicial District Court, Parish of Washington, No. 06-CR1-94104. BEFORE: PETTIGREW, McDONALD, AND PENZATO, JJ.

WRIT DENIED. Relator's convictions and sentences became final in 2011, and the delay to seek postconviction relief in this case expired in 2013. The affidavit attached to this writ does not support a claim of jury misconduct such as to serve as an exception to the time delay. See La. Code Crim. P. arts. 922(D) & 930.8(A). If an application for postconviction relief is untimely, it should not be considered on the merits. See State v. LeBlanc, 2006-0169 (La. 9/15/06), 937 So.2d 844 (per curiam). Furthermore, there is no allegation that any outside influence was improperly brought to bear upon any juror, and no allegation that any extraneous prejudicial information was improperly brought to the jury's attention in this case. See La. Code Evid. art. 606(B); State v. Richardson, 91-2339 (La. App. 1st Cir. 5/20/94), 637 So.2d 709, 712. Accordingly, the district court did not err by denying relator's untimely application for postconviction relief, or by not holding an evidentiary hearing.

JMM

AHP

JTP

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT /s/_________

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT


Summaries of

State v. Adams

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
Apr 18, 2017
NO. 2017 KW 0169 (La. Ct. App. Apr. 18, 2017)
Case details for

State v. Adams

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF LOUISIANA v. LAKEISHA SHANAE ADAMS

Court:STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 18, 2017

Citations

NO. 2017 KW 0169 (La. Ct. App. Apr. 18, 2017)