From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Acampora

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jun 6, 2018
329 Conn. 903 (Conn. 2018)

Opinion

06-06-2018

STATE of Connecticut v. Joseph C. ACAMPORA, Jr.

Mary A. Beattie, assigned counsel, in support of the petition. Michele C. Lukban, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.


The defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 176 Conn.App. 202, 169 A.3d 820 (2018), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the defendant waived the issue of whether the trial court was required to canvass him regarding his right to self-representation prior to February 23, 2012?

"2. If the answer to the first question is no, did the trial court improperly fail to canvass the defendant regarding his right to self-representation prior to February 23, 2012?

"3. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court's February 23, 2012 canvass was sufficient and that the defendant effectively waived his right to counsel?"


Summaries of

State v. Acampora

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jun 6, 2018
329 Conn. 903 (Conn. 2018)
Case details for

State v. Acampora

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Connecticut v. Joseph C. ACAMPORA, Jr.

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Jun 6, 2018

Citations

329 Conn. 903 (Conn. 2018)
184 A.3d 1215

Citing Cases

State v. Joseph A.

And (3) "[d]id the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court's February 23, 2012 canvass was…