State v. Abu-Serieh

6 Citing cases

  1. State v. Rodriguez

    No. A-21-159 (Neb. Ct. App. Nov. 9, 2021)

    Rodriguez argues that he was in lawful possession of the vehicle and as such had standing to challenge the search. Before a party may challenge a search without a warrant, he or she must have standing in a legal controversy. State v. Abu-Serieh, 25 Neb.App. 462, 908 N.W.2d 86 (2018).

  2. State v. Terry

    No. A-18-341 (Neb. Ct. App. Feb. 26, 2019)

    A traffic violation, no matter how minor, creates probable cause to stop the driver of a vehicle. State v. Abu-Serieh, 25 Neb. App. 462, 908 N.W.2d 86 (2018). The record contains sufficient evidence to conclude the driver committed a minor traffic violation.

  3. Parnell v. Frakes

    8:19CV32 (D. Neb. Dec. 19, 2019)

    Before a party may challenge a search without a warrant, he or she must have standing in a legal controversy. State v. Abu-Serieh, 25 Neb. App. 462, 908 N.W.2d 86 (2018). "Standing" means that a person has a sufficient legally protectable interest which may be affected in a justiciable controversy, entitling that person to judicial resolution of the controversy.

  4. State v. Collier

    No. A-21-554 (Neb. Ct. App. Feb. 8, 2022)

    And a traffic violation, no matter how minor, creates probable cause to stop the driver of a vehicle. State v. Abu-Serieh, 25 Neb.App. 462, 908 N.W.2d 86 (2018).

  5. State v. Parnell

    No. A-17-1147 (Neb. Ct. App. Oct. 16, 2018)

    Before a party may challenge a search without a warrant, he or she must have standing in a legal controversy. State v. Abu-Serieh, 25 Neb. App. 462, 908 N.W.2d 86 (2018). "Standing" means that a person has a sufficient legally protectable interest which may be affected in a justiciable controversy, entitling that person to judicial resolution of the controversy.

  6. State v. Khalil

    25 Neb. App. 449 (Neb. Ct. App. 2018)   Cited 12 times
    In Khalil, the defendant similarly argued that his motion to suppress should have been granted because his Fourth Amendment rights were violated when the police officer impermissibly extended the scope of the traffic stop beyond what was reasonable to issue a warning for a traffic violation.

    BACKGROUNDThe events giving rise to this case, and the issues raised on appeal, are substantially intermingled with those in a companion case filed today in State v. Abu-Serieh, 25 Neb.App. 462, 908 N.W.2d 86 (2018). Khalil and Issa Abu-Serieh were driving separate rental vehicles but traveling together on Interstate 80 when the relevant events occurred.