From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Abdullah

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Dec 31, 2019
2019-UP-406 (S.C. Ct. App. Dec. 31, 2019)

Opinion

2019-UP-406

12-31-2019

The State, Respondent, v. Muttaqin Fatir Abdullah, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2016-002217

Appellate Defender Adam Sinclair Ruffin, of Columbia, and Muttaqin Fatir Abdullah, pro se. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Melody Jane Brown, of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted November 1, 2019

Appeal From Sumter County D. Craig Brown, Circuit Court Judge

Appellate Defender Adam Sinclair Ruffin, of Columbia, and Muttaqin Fatir Abdullah, pro se.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Melody Jane Brown, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:

Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

SHORT, THOMAS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Abdullah

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Dec 31, 2019
2019-UP-406 (S.C. Ct. App. Dec. 31, 2019)
Case details for

State v. Abdullah

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Muttaqin Fatir Abdullah, Appellant. Appellate…

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Dec 31, 2019

Citations

2019-UP-406 (S.C. Ct. App. Dec. 31, 2019)