State v. a 24 Hr. Bail Bonding

3 Citing cases

  1. State v. Anytime Bail Bonding, Inc.

    301 Ga. App. 832 (Ga. Ct. App. 2009)

    We review a trial court's findings as to a surety's due diligence for an abuse of discretion, and will affirm unless those findings are clearly erroneous (i.e., not supported by any evidence). State of Ga. v. A 24 Hour Bail Bonding, 280 Ga.App. 463, 466, 634 S.E.2d 99 (2006); Delta Bail Bonds v. State of Ga., 245 Ga.App. 491, 492, 538 S.E.2d 146 (2000).           So viewed, the record shows that the City of Forest Park Police Department arrested Eriberto Magana on June 9, 2007.

  2. Northington v. State

    650 S.E.2d 760 (Ga. Ct. App. 2007)

    In the Matter of Coatsey Ellison, 280 Ga. 303 ( 627 SE2d 25) (2006).State of Ga. v. A 24 Hour Bail Bonding, 280 Ga. App. 463, 466 (4) ( 634 SE2d 99) (2006). When the trial court denied a second continuance, a trial ensued in May 2006. The jury acquitted Northington of the charges for simple battery and harassing phone calls but found him guilty on the battery charge.

  3. Mitchell v. State

    283 Ga. App. 456 (Ga. Ct. App. 2007)   Cited 12 times
    Explaining that it is "improper to allow a witness to testify as to the identity of a person in a video or photograph when such opinion evidence tends only to establish a fact which average jurors could decide thinking for themselves and drawing their own conclusions"

    Thus Ingram's testimony was not offered for impeachment. See generally State v. A 24 Hour Bail Bonding, 280 Ga. App. 463, 465 (3) ( 634 SE2d 99) (2006) (admission of bail bondsmen's purported expert opinions as to the principal's true name was erroneous as determination of the principal's true name did not require the drawing of a conclusion beyond the ken of the average layman). The state argues that the admission of Ingram's testimony, if error, was harmless.