State v. $7379.54 United States Currency

6 Citing cases

  1. Frantzen v. Davenport Elec.

    206 Conn. App. 359 (Conn. App. Ct. 2021)   Cited 2 times
    Considering deferential standard of review, board improperly reversed commissioner's decision on basis of its assertion that decision "could have rested on a more solid evidentiary foundation"

    Even if this claim were properly before us, we would decline to entertain the merits of Vaccaro's claim of recusal on appeal in light of the fact that Vaccaro never properly raised the issue of recusal to the commissioner. See State v. $7379.54 United States Currency , 80 Conn. App. 471, 472โ€“73 n.2, 844 A.2d 220 (2003) (stating well settled rule that appellate courts ordinarily will decline to review on appeal claim that trier should have recused itself if no such request was made at trial); Cummings v. Twin Tool Mfg. Co. , 40 Conn. App. 36, 45โ€“47, 668 A.2d 1346 (1996) (applying rule in workersโ€™ compensation appeal).Second, Vaccaro argues for the first time before this court that the March 22, 2016 hearing should have been stayed because the question of the commissioner's subject matter jurisdiction was pending before this court.

  2. State v. Weathers

    188 Conn. App. 600 (Conn. App. Ct. 2019)   Cited 6 times
    Holding that clear error review applies to trial court's finding, based on video recording, that defendant was not experiencing mental breakdown at time of crime

    (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. $7379.54 United States Currency , 80 Conn. App. 471, 476, 844 A.2d 220 (2003). Common sense similarly dictates that inattention and confusion are not necessarily indicative of a mental disease or defect.

  3. State v. Fisher

    121 Conn. App. 335 (Conn. App. Ct. 2010)   Cited 5 times
    Applying Kelly totality of circumstances analysis to claim that trial court improperly took defendant's silence into account, thereby penalizing him for exercise of fifth amendment rights, in dispositional phase of violation of probation proceeding

    Our review of factual determinations is limited to whether those findings are clearly erroneous. Practice Book ยง 60-5; State v. $7379.54 United States Currency, 80 Conn. App. 471, 474-75, 844 A.2d 220 (2003). We must defer to the trier of fact's assessment of the credibility of the witnesses, which is made on the basis of its firsthand observation of their conduct, demeanor and attitude.

  4. In re Mehki K

    2010 Ct. Sup. 11374 (Conn. Super. Ct. 2010)

    Garrett's Appeal from Probate, 44 Conn.Sup. 169, 186, 677 A.2d 1000 (1994), aff'd, 237 Conn. 233, 676 A.2d 394 (1996)." State v. $7379.54 United States Currency, 80 Conn.App. 471, 476-77 (2003). The parents of this child were never married.

  5. State v. 2000 Chevy Silverado

    2005 Ct. Sup. 11060 (Conn. Super. Ct. 2005)

    " (Emphasis in original; internal quotations marks omitted.) State v. $7,379.54 United States Currency, 80 Conn.App. 471, 475, 844 A.2d 220 (2003), citing Charlton v. Commission of Correction, 51 Conn.App. 87, 90, 719 A.2d 1205 (1998), cert. denied, 247 Conn. 961, 723 A.2d 815 (1999). The guilt or innocence of the owner of the vehicle is not in issue in an action in rem for forfeiture of an automobile.

  6. IN RE NOAH B.

    2005 Ct. Sup. 2666 (Conn. Super. Ct. 2005)   Cited 2 times

    Garrett's Appeal from Probate, 44 Conn.Sup. 169, 186, 677 A.2d 1000 (1994), aff'd, 237 Conn. 233, 676 A.2d 394 (1996)." State v. $7379.54 United States Currency, 80 Conn.App. 471, 476-77 (2003).I.A. PROCEDURAL HISTORY