From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

STATE, USE OF ABBOTT v. STOCKLEY'S ADM'R

Superior Court of Delaware
Jan 1, 1833
1 Del. 134 (Del. Super. Ct. 1833)

Opinion

Spring Sessions, 1833.

Layton, for plff. Cullen, for deft.


The plff. offered to prove the infancy of Mrs. Abbott to rebut the plea of the statute of limitations, but it was objected to and insisted that he ought to have replied the infancy.

The Court said that where a party relied on infancy to prevent the operation of the statute, he must reply it so as to give the other side notice.

The plff. suffered nonsuit.


Summaries of

STATE, USE OF ABBOTT v. STOCKLEY'S ADM'R

Superior Court of Delaware
Jan 1, 1833
1 Del. 134 (Del. Super. Ct. 1833)
Case details for

STATE, USE OF ABBOTT v. STOCKLEY'S ADM'R

Case Details

Full title:STATE use of JOHN ABBOTT and WIFE vs. LEVIN STUART, administrator of JEHU…

Court:Superior Court of Delaware

Date published: Jan 1, 1833

Citations

1 Del. 134 (Del. Super. Ct. 1833)