From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State of Texas v. M. T. Wilson

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Jun 24, 1936
95 S.W.2d 971 (Tex. Crim. App. 1936)

Summary

In State v. Wilson, 131 Tex.Cr.R. 43, 95 S.W.2d 971 (1936), the Court held that the State's attempt to appeal the quashing of an indictment came within the proscription of Section 26.

Summary of this case from White v. State

Opinion

No. 18560.

Delivered June 24, 1936.

Appeal — Indictment.

Under section 26 of article 5 of the State Constitution, State held not entitled to appeal from ruling granting defendant's motion to quash indictment.

Appeal from the District Court of Gregg County. Tried below before the Hon. D. S. Meredith, Jr., Judge.

Request by State for permission to file appeal.

Request denied.

The opinion states the case.

Claude A. Williams, Criminal District Attorney, of Longview, for Appellant. John E. Taylor and Cecil Storey, both of Longview, for Appellee.


In this case the appellee was charged by indictment, returned in the District Court of Gregg County, with the offense of embezzlement. On the day that the case was set for trial appellee filed and urged a motion to quash the indictment. The trial court sustained the motion. The State. through its district attorney excepted to the ruling of the trial court, gave notice of appeal, and sought to bring this case to this court for review by the method of appeal. Sec. 26 of Art. V of the Constitution of this State reads as follows: "The State shall have no right of appeal in criminal cases." This being a criminal case the State has no right to appeal. The cases upon which the State relies were decided before the present Constitution was adopted. The State's request for permission to file appeal is denied.

Request denied.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.


Summaries of

State of Texas v. M. T. Wilson

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Jun 24, 1936
95 S.W.2d 971 (Tex. Crim. App. 1936)

In State v. Wilson, 131 Tex.Cr.R. 43, 95 S.W.2d 971 (1936), the Court held that the State's attempt to appeal the quashing of an indictment came within the proscription of Section 26.

Summary of this case from White v. State
Case details for

State of Texas v. M. T. Wilson

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLANT, v. M. T. WILSON, APPELLEE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Jun 24, 1936

Citations

95 S.W.2d 971 (Tex. Crim. App. 1936)
95 S.W.2d 971

Citing Cases

White v. State

In Hart, the Court of Appeals also held that the State could not evade the mandate of the constitutional…