Opinion
No. 321.
February 22, 2007.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Gregory Carro, J), rendered November 17, 2004, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of burglary in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 2½ to 5 years, unanimously affirmed.
Donald E. Cameron, New York, for appellant.
Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney, New York (Karen Schlossberg of counsel), for respondent.
Before: Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Marlow, Nardelli and Gonzalez, JJ.
The court did not finally deny defendant's motion to suppress physical evidence ( see CPL 710.70; People v Rizzo, 5 AD3d 924, 925, lv denied 3 NY3d 646). The record indicates that the court was prepared to receive and consider the supplementary affidavit that defendant offered to provide. Therefore, defendant's ensuing guilty plea waived the suppression issue, and the exception in CPL 710.70 (2) does not apply ( see People v Fernandez, 67 NY2d 686, 688). In any event, while defendant's motion papers may have been sufficient to allege standing to challenge a search and seizure, they were insufficient to raise a factual issue warranting a hearing.