From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State of New York v. Christopher Buniek

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 22, 2009
65 A.D.3d 1258 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 2005-10477.

September 22, 2009.

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated June 10, 2008 ( People v Buniek, 52 AD3d 621), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, rendered February 8, 2005.

Christopher Buniek, Napanoch, N.Y., appellant pro se.

Janet DiFiore, District Attorney, White Plains, N.Y. (William C. Milaccio and Richard Longworth Hecht of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Rivera, J.P., Spolzino, Dickerson and Eng, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel ( see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277).


Summaries of

State of New York v. Christopher Buniek

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 22, 2009
65 A.D.3d 1258 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

State of New York v. Christopher Buniek

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CHRISTOPHER BUNIEK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 22, 2009

Citations

65 A.D.3d 1258 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 6700
885 N.Y.S.2d 429