From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State of Maine v. Ross

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Aroostook
Feb 2, 1965
206 A.2d 540 (Me. 1965)

Opinion

Opinion, February 2, 1965

Appeals. Criminal Law.

By filing no brief and making no argument, defendant abandoned challenge to legal sufficiency of State's complaint.

ON APPEAL.

Defendant appeals from judgment of Superior Court. Held, by filing no brief and making no argument, defendant abandoned the challenge to legal sufficiency of the State's complaint. Case remanded to Superior Court.

John O. Rogers, County Attorney, for State.

Nathan H. Solman, for Defendant.

SITTING: WILLIAMSON, C.J., WEBBER, TAPLEY, SULLIVAN, SIDDALL, MARDEN, JJ.


MEMORANDUM DECISION

This case was reported to the Law Court by agreement of the parties upon defendant's demurrer and State's joinder.

The defendant has filed no brief and has made no argument. Defendant has accordingly abandoned his challenge of the legal sufficiency of the State's complaint.

The entry will be:

Case remanded to the Superior Court.


Summaries of

State of Maine v. Ross

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Aroostook
Feb 2, 1965
206 A.2d 540 (Me. 1965)
Case details for

State of Maine v. Ross

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF MAINE vs. DAVID ROSS

Court:Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Aroostook

Date published: Feb 2, 1965

Citations

206 A.2d 540 (Me. 1965)
206 A.2d 540