From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State of Maine v. Corey

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Aroostook
Feb 16, 1965
206 A.2d 857 (Me. 1965)

Opinion

Opinion, February 16, 1965.

Criminal Law.

Supreme Court would not decide important question of law on report wholly unaided by brief or argument of counsel for criminal respondent, but would discharge report and remand case.

ON REPORT.

This criminal prosecution on report by agreement of parties upon agreed statement of facts. Held, that the Supreme Court would not decide important question of law on report wholly unaided by brief or argument of counsel for criminal respondent but would discharge report and remand case. Report discharged and case remanded.

John O. Rogers, Aroostook County Attorney, for State.

David Solman, for Defendant.


MEMORANDUM DECISION

This case was reported to the Law Court by agreement of the parties upon an agreed statement of facts.

The defendant has filed no brief and has made no argument. The court deems it inexpedient to decide an important question of law on report wholly unaided by brief or argument of counsel for a criminal respondent.

The entry will be

Report discharged.

Case remanded to the Superior Court.


Summaries of

State of Maine v. Corey

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Aroostook
Feb 16, 1965
206 A.2d 857 (Me. 1965)
Case details for

State of Maine v. Corey

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF MAINE vs. NAGEB COREY

Court:Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Aroostook

Date published: Feb 16, 1965

Citations

206 A.2d 857 (Me. 1965)
206 A.2d 857