From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State of Florida ex Rel. Clark v. Vaughn

Supreme Court of Florida, Division B
Nov 22, 1926
110 So. 659 (Fla. 1926)

Opinion

Opinion Filed November 22, 1926.

A Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Freeman P. Lane, Judge.

Affirmed.

James F. Bickers, for Plaintiff in Error;

Booth Hobson, A. S. Bradley and Mabry, Reaves Carlton, for Defendant in Error.


The writ of error in this case was issued on the 17th day of May, 1926, and was made returnable to the 10th day of June, 1926. This was in compliance with Section 3580, Rev. Gen. Statutes of Fla., and also complied with the view expressed by this Court in the case of Carter v. State, 65 Fla. 347.

In the case of Gillooley, Appellant, v. Vaughn et al., Appellee, in opinion filed at this term of the Court, this Court held that ordinance 422-a, the validity of which is here questioned, appeared to be valid in all respects.

The order of the Circuit Court remanding the petitioner to the custody of E. D. Vaughn, as Chief of Police of the City of St. Petersburg, is now affirmed upon the authority of the opinion in the case of Gillooley v. Vaughn, filed at this term of the Court.

Affirmed.

WHITFIELD, P. J., AND TERRELL AND BUFORD, J. J., concur.

BROWN, C. J., AND ELLIS AND STRUM, J. J., concur in the opinion.


Summaries of

State of Florida ex Rel. Clark v. Vaughn

Supreme Court of Florida, Division B
Nov 22, 1926
110 So. 659 (Fla. 1926)
Case details for

State of Florida ex Rel. Clark v. Vaughn

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF FLORIDA ex rel. C. J. CLARK, Plaintiff in Error, v. E. D. VAUGHN…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida, Division B

Date published: Nov 22, 1926

Citations

110 So. 659 (Fla. 1926)
110 So. 659

Citing Cases

McMULLEN ET AL. v. NEWMAR CORP. ET AL

Even if those allegations, if sustained, would entitle the complainants to have the high lands excluded from…