From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

California v. Meek

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jun 7, 1937
90 F.2d 537 (9th Cir. 1937)

Opinion

No. 8409.

June 7, 1937.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of California, Central Division; George Cosgrave, Judge.

Proceeding between the State of California and H.A. Meek, as receiver of the El Camino Oil Company, Limited, and others. From an adverse order, the State appeals.

Reversed, with instructions.

U.S. Webb, Atty. Gen., State of California, and John O. Palstine, Deputy Atty. Gen., for appellant.

Earl Glen Whitehead, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee Meek, receiver.

A. Maxson Smith, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellees Kenney and Wickes.

Before WILBUR, GARRECHT, and HANEY, Circuit Judges.


This is an appeal from an order of the District Court entered June 15, 1936, giving the State of California priority for gasoline taxes over the claims of F.R. Kenney and L.W. Wickes, which were secured by trust deed, as to all amounts which accrued before the execution and recordation of the trust deed and giving the appellees priority as to their indebtedness secured by the trust deed, over gasoline taxes subsequently accruing to the state. After the order of the trial court, this court considered the question involved herein and held that the state was entitled to priority over private liens perfected before the accrual of the tax. Berryessa Cattle Co. v. Sunset Pacific Oil Co. (Sunset Pacific Oil Co. v. State of California) (C.C.A.) 87 F.2d 972. Upon the authority of that decision the order of the trial court is reversed with instructions to modify the order by giving the state preference over the claims of appellees F.R. Kenney and L.W. Wickes secured by trust deed.

Reversed.


Summaries of

California v. Meek

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jun 7, 1937
90 F.2d 537 (9th Cir. 1937)
Case details for

California v. Meek

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF CALIFORNIA v. MEEK et al

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jun 7, 1937

Citations

90 F.2d 537 (9th Cir. 1937)