Opinion
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)
Barbara E. La Wall, Esq., Pima County Attorney's Office, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Neale E. Smith, Tucson, AZ, pro se.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, David C. Bury, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-05-00626-DCB.
Before: BEEZER, T.G. NELSON and BEA, Circuit Judges.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Upon review of the record and appellant's response to this court's February 9, 2006 order to show cause, this court hereby summarily affirms the district court's order remanding the action to state court. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (summary affirmance appropriate where result is clear from face of record).
AFFIRMED.