From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State ex rel. La Vigne Electric Co. v. Floyd

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 9, 1961
131 So. 2d 208 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1961)

Opinion

Nos. 61-264, 61-265.

June 9, 1961.

Welsh, Cornell, Pyszka Carlton, Miami, for petitioner LaVigne Electric Company.

Blackwell, Walker Gray, Miami, for petitioner Federated Department Stores, Inc.

Oscar Rappaport, Miami, for respondent.


A rule nisi in prohibition was issued in each of these cases. No return has been made by the respondent. We have therefore considered the allegations of the suggestion and the documents in support thereof. See State ex rel. Ginsberg v. Wiseheart, Fla.App. 1960, 120 So.2d 810.

We hold that the suggestion makes a prima facie case. A trial judge may not grant a petition for rehearing addressed to a summary final judgment. Cf. Marans v. Stang, Fla.App. 1960, 124 So.2d 891.

Accordingly, judgment in prohibition is awarded, but we assume it will not be necessary to issue the writ.

HORTON, C.J., and PEARSON and CARROLL, CHAS., JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State ex rel. La Vigne Electric Co. v. Floyd

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 9, 1961
131 So. 2d 208 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1961)
Case details for

State ex rel. La Vigne Electric Co. v. Floyd

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF FLORIDA EX REL. LA VIGNE ELECTRIC COMPANY, A FLORIDA CORPORATION…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jun 9, 1961

Citations

131 So. 2d 208 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1961)

Citing Cases

State v. Floyd

PER CURIAM. Whereas judgment in prohibition in the above styled cause was awarded by this court on June 9,…

C.M. Whitney v. Mid-State Prestressed

It is conceded by the parties that the deposition of defendant's president, which was properly and timely…