From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State Farm Mutual Automobile v. Patton

Court of Appeals of Kentucky
May 18, 1982
631 S.W.2d 850 (Ky. Ct. App. 1982)

Opinion

November 6, 1981. Withdrawn and Reissued March 19, 1982. Discretionary Review Denied May 18, 1982.

Appeal from the Crittenden Circuit Court, Will Tom Wathen, J.

J. David Boswell, Hardy, Terrell Boswell, Paducah, for appellant.

J. Wendell Roberts, Westberry Roberts, Marion, for appellee Patton.

George R. Effinger, Paducah, for appellees Beavers and Grain Dealers Mut. Ins. Co.

Joe Owen, Benton, for appellee Shewcraft.

Before COOPER, HOWARD and WILHOIT, JJ.


OPINION AND ORDER DISMISSING


State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company appeals from an order of the Crittenden Circuit Court awarding a fee to the attorneys for the appellee Ricky D. Patton out of the recovery of basic reparation benefits that had been paid by State Farm. The appellant has failed to include the attorneys for the appellee Patton as parties to this appeal, although their presence is indispensable for appellate review of the order. See Wilhelm v. Wilhelm, Ky., 504 S.W.2d 699 (1973); Coyle v. Horseman's Executrix, 271 Ky. 100, 111 S.W.2d 590 (1937); Bartlett v. Louisville Trust Co., 212 Ky. 13, 277 S.W. 250 (1925); Beaver v. Beaver, Ky.App., 551 S.W.2d 23 (1977). Despite the appellant's assertion to the contrary, this Court's opinion in Meridian Mutual Insurance Co. v. Walker, Ky.App., 602 S.W.2d 181 (1980), does not stand for the proposition that an attorney is not a necessary party to an appeal in which the fee to be paid him is in issue. The failure of the attorneys to be named as parties to the appeal was neither raised nor considered by the Court in that case.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the appeal be, and it is hereby, DISMISSED.

Because of this action, we find it unnecessary to rule on the appellant's motion to require the appellee Patton to release recovered monies, which motion was passed to this panel for consideration with a determination on the merits.

All concur.


Summaries of

State Farm Mutual Automobile v. Patton

Court of Appeals of Kentucky
May 18, 1982
631 S.W.2d 850 (Ky. Ct. App. 1982)
Case details for

State Farm Mutual Automobile v. Patton

Case Details

Full title:STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Ricky D…

Court:Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Date published: May 18, 1982

Citations

631 S.W.2d 850 (Ky. Ct. App. 1982)

Citing Cases

Franklin County Fiscal Court v. Stewart

In addition to the authority relied upon by this Court in Shewmaker, there are other cases which hold that…

Dubick v. Dubick

Regarding the facts of the case at bar, we believe that the one hundred seventy three days that passed…