From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Hawkins

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Mar 18, 2011
Case No.: 2:08-cv-10367-DT (E.D. Mich. Mar. 18, 2011)

Opinion

Case No.: 2:08-cv-10367-DT.

March 18, 2011

Michael W. Slater (P65227), HEWSON VAN HELLEMONT, P.C., Co-Counsel for Plaintiff, Grand Rapids, MI.

James F. Hewson (P27127), Diane L. Hewson (P44628), HEWSON VAN HELLEMONT, P.C., Co-Counsel for Plaintiff, Oak Park, MI.

Thomas W. Cranmer (P25252), David D. O'Brien (P65532), MILLER, CANFIELD, PADDOCK STONE, Attorneys for Arthur Liss and Liss, Seder Andrews, P.C. Troy, MI.

Ross O. Silverman, KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP, Co-Counsel for Plaintiff, Chicago, IL.

Deanna Hawkins, In Pro Per, Beaumont, TX.


ORDER


This matter having come before the Court on Third Parties Arthur Liss's ("Liss") and Liss, Seder Andrews, P.C.'s (the "Liss Firm") Motion to Quash the July 6, 2010 subpoenas served on them by Plaintiff State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company ("State Farm") [Doc. 105], and this Court having granted in part and denied in part their Motion in its February 10, 2011 Opinion and Order [Doc. 128], IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. Subject to paragraph 2, on or before April 8, 2011, Liss and the Liss Firm are directed to produce: (a) all documents created on or after October 2003 relating to Fecchia Hawkins, and (b) all documents created on or after October 2003 relating to Deanna Hawkins' (i) attendant care claims, (ii) guardianship and conservatorship for Fecchia Hawkins, and (iii) bankruptcy proceedings. Any documents produced by Liss and the Liss Firm in response to this order are subject to the terms of the "Stipulated Protective Order" entered on July 7, 2010.

2. Liss and the Liss Firm need not produce any of the following: (a) documents relating to, communications with, or work product prepared by their attorneys at Miller, Canfield, Paddock Stone, P.L.C., and any other attorney or attorneys consulted by Liss or the Liss Firm regarding the defense of a possible fraud suit filed by State Farm, (b) filed pleadings, hearing transcripts or depositions from: (i) any lawsuit between Deanna Hawkins, Fecchia Hawkins and State Farm, (ii) any probate court matters relating to Deanna Hawkins' guardianship or conservatorship for Fecchia Hawkins, or (iii) Deanna Hawkins' bankruptcy proceeding, (c) documents that fall within the common interest privilege as outlined in the Court's June 4, 2010 and July 14, 2010 Opinions and Orders, (d) documents already in State Farm's possession, and (e) documents that would not be admissible in this case against Deanna Hawkins.

To the extent that Liss or the Liss Firm withholds any documents on the basis of any privilege that they otherwise would have had to produce in response to this order, all such documents must be identified in a privilege log and submitted to the Court for in camera inspection on or before April 8, 2011. To the extent that Liss or the Liss Firm withholds any documents on the basis that they would only be admissible in a proceeding against the thirdparty witnesses, all such documents must be identified in a log and submitted to the Court for in camera inspection on or before April 8, 2011. After the court has determined which logged documents, if any, should be produced, it will enter an order directing Liss and the Liss Firm to produce those documents for State Farm, and will not transfer the documents from the court to State Farm directly.

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record and/or pro se parties on this date, March 18, 2011, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.


Summaries of

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Hawkins

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Mar 18, 2011
Case No.: 2:08-cv-10367-DT (E.D. Mich. Mar. 18, 2011)
Case details for

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Hawkins

Case Details

Full title:STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. DEANNA…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Mar 18, 2011

Citations

Case No.: 2:08-cv-10367-DT (E.D. Mich. Mar. 18, 2011)