From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. United States

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 15, 2022
1:21-cv-01180-DAD-BAK (EPG) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 15, 2022)

Opinion

1:21-cv-01180-DAD-BAK (EPG)

06-15-2022

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant.


ORDER CLOSING THE CASE

(ECF NO. 25)

The parties have reported that they have settled “each and every claim of any kind, whether known or unknown, arising directly or indirectly from the acts or omissions that gave rise to [this action].” (ECF No. 25 at 1). The parties have agreed to dismissal of this case with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), with each of the parties to bear their own costs, fees, and expenses. (Id. at 2). The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 makes such stipulations effective immediately without further order of the Court. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. United States

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 15, 2022
1:21-cv-01180-DAD-BAK (EPG) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 15, 2022)
Case details for

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. United States

Case Details

Full title:STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. UNITED…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 15, 2022

Citations

1:21-cv-01180-DAD-BAK (EPG) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 15, 2022)