From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Deichmeier

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 24, 1986
117 A.D.2d 795 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

February 24, 1986

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Underwood, J.).


Judgment modified, on the law, by adding thereto a provision declaring that the defendant Evelyn Deichmeier is entitled to no-fault benefits under a policy of automobile insurance issued to her by the plaintiff State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. As so modified, judgment affirmed, with costs to the defendant.

No questions of fact exist regarding the arbitration proceeding encompassing the defendant's claim for no-fault benefits for the period between February 13, 1982 and February 13, 1983, and, therefore, the defendant was properly granted summary judgment. The plaintiff failed to make any showing through acceptable medical proof that the defendant was not entitled to receive no-fault benefits during this period of time. The report of Dr. Hudak submitted during an earlier arbitration proceeding pertains to, and resulted from, his examination during a period of time not encompassed by the proceeding presently sub judice.

We note that Special Term erred in dismissing the complaint without declaring the rights of the parties (see, Lanza v Wagner, 11 N.Y.2d 317, 334, appeal dismissed 371 U.S. 74, cert denied 371 U.S. 901). Lazer, J.P., Mangano, Bracken and Niehoff, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Deichmeier

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 24, 1986
117 A.D.2d 795 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Deichmeier

Case Details

Full title:STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. EVELYN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 24, 1986

Citations

117 A.D.2d 795 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)