Opinion
56,157-CA 56,158-CA
12-12-2024
Appealed from Caddo Parish Nos. 613,328, 613,328.
Before STEPHENS, THOMPSON, and ROBINSON, JJ.
ORDER
The appellants-Tillman Carroll; Twana Carroll; Ethan Williams Chumley; Mary Elizabeth Chumley; Dr. Edward G. Chumley; Chumley Property Management, LLC; and Aquatech Industries, LLC-and the appellee, Houston Specialty Insurance Company, have filed a joint motion to supplement the record with three flash drives containing various exhibits attached to the following pleadings: Supplemental Memorandum in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment filed on behalf of Appellee on January 27, 2023; Motion for Summary Judgment filed on behalf of Appellee on July 21, 2023; and Memorandum in Opposition to (Houston Specialty's) Motion for Summary Judgmen t and Statement of Contested Material Facts filed on behalf of Defendant-Appellant, Aquatech Industries, LLC, Mary Elizabeth Chumley, individually, and Dr. Edward G. Chumley, individually on September 27, 2023. The appellants and appellee request that the exhibits be printed out and numbered so that their respective briefs are in compliance with U.R.C.A. 2-12.4 &2-12.5. The flash drives have been supplemented into the record as Exhibit 1-S. The appellants and appellee may reference the documents within the exhibits in their respective briefs as they are identified on the flash drives. Accordingly, the joint motion to supplement is denied as moot.