From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State ex rel. Young v. Gall

Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA
Apr 1, 2014
2014 Ohio 1441 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014)

Opinion

No. 100919

04-01-2014

STATE EX REL., EVANGELIST A. YOUNG RELATOR v. CUYAHOGA COUNTY COURT JUDGE STEVEN GALL RESPONDENT

RELATOR Evangelist A. Young, pro se Grafton Correctional Institution ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT Timothy J. McGinty Cuyahoga County Prosecutor By: James E. Moss Assistant County Prosecutor


JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION


JUDGMENT:

WRIT DENIED


Writ of Procedendo

Motion No. 472246

Order No. 473382

RELATOR

Evangelist A. Young, pro se
Grafton Correctional Institution

ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT

Timothy J. McGinty
Cuyahoga County Prosecutor
By: James E. Moss
Assistant County Prosecutor
KATHLEEN ANN KEOUGH, J.:

{¶1} Evangelist A. Young ("Young") has filed a complaint for writ of procedendo. Young seeks an order from this court that requires Judge Steven Gall to rule on motions he filed in Cuyahoga C.P. Nos. CR-11-553117-A and CR-11-552705. Judge Gall has moved for summary judgment, which we grant because the complaint is moot.

{¶2} Young seeks to compel a ruling on a motion for jail-time credit that he alleges was filed on October 31, 2013. Young filed motions for jail-time credit in case number CR-11-552705 on November 5, 2013, and March 5, 2014. The court issued orders granting Young jail-time credit in that case on January 29, 2014, and March 10, 2014. In CR-11-553117-A, Young filed a motion for jail-time credit on November 6, 2013, and the court issued an order granting Young jail time credit in that case on January 29, 2014.

{¶3} Young is not entitled to a writ of procedendo because respondent has already ruled on the motions. "A writ of procedendo will not issue to compel the performance of a duty that has already been performed." State ex rel. Roberts v. Marsh, _ Ohio St. 3d _, 2014-Ohio-106, ¶ 6, citing State ex rel. Grove v. Nadel, 84 Ohio St.3d 252, 253, 1998-Ohio-541, 703 N.E.2d 304 (1998)

{¶4} Judge Gall's motion for summary judgment is granted, and Young's complaint for a writ of procedendo is denied. Relator to pay costs. Costs waived. The court directs the clerk of court to serve all parties with notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal as required by Civ.R. 58(B).

{¶5} Writ denied. __________
KATHLEEN ANN KEOUGH, JUDGE
KENNETH A. ROCCO, P.J., and
TIM McCORMACK, J., CONCUR


Summaries of

State ex rel. Young v. Gall

Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA
Apr 1, 2014
2014 Ohio 1441 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014)
Case details for

State ex rel. Young v. Gall

Case Details

Full title:STATE EX REL., EVANGELIST A. YOUNG RELATOR v. CUYAHOGA COUNTY COURT JUDGE…

Court:Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA

Date published: Apr 1, 2014

Citations

2014 Ohio 1441 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014)