From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State ex rel. Wright v. State

Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Sep 16, 2016
201 So. 3d 250 (La. 2016)

Opinion

No. 2015-KH-1462

09-16-2016

State ex rel. Benjamin Wright, Jr. v. State of Louisiana


:

Denied. The application was not timely filed in the district court, and relator fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93–2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.Relator has now fully litigated three applications for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, see 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The District Court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.


Summaries of

State ex rel. Wright v. State

Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Sep 16, 2016
201 So. 3d 250 (La. 2016)
Case details for

State ex rel. Wright v. State

Case Details

Full title:State ex rel. Benjamin Wright, Jr. v. State of Louisiana

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Date published: Sep 16, 2016

Citations

201 So. 3d 250 (La. 2016)