State ex rel. Wilson v. Superior Court (Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.)

Full title: THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ex rel. MICHAEL WILSON et al., Petitioners, v. THE…

Court: California Court of Appeals, Second District, First Division

Date published: Jul 25, 2014

No. B252073 (Cal. Ct. App. Jul. 25, 2014)

Opinion

Page 1249f

227 Cal.App.4th 1249f __ Cal.Rptr.3d __ THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ex rel. MICHAEL WILSON et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB CO., Real Party in Interest. B252073 California Court of Appeals, Second District, First Division July 25, 2014

THE COURT:

It is ordered that footnote 19 on page 17 [227 Cal.App.4th 598, advance report] of the opinion filed herein on June 27, 2014, 227 Cal.App.4th 579; ___ Cal.Rptr.3d ___, be modified to read as follows and the petition for rehearing is DENIED:

Although the remedies provided by section 1871.7 are expressly nonexclusive, and section 1871.7 expressly provides for equitable remedies, the precise nature and extent of the equitable or other remedies that might or might not be available is not among the issues raised in this proceeding. This opinion’s discussion of particular potential remedies should not be understood to preclude the adjudication of these issues when they are appropriately raised. We also express no opinion on the question whether violations of subdivision (a) might give rise to remedies under provisions such as the unfair competition law, Business and Professions Code section 17200 et seq.

There is no change in the judgment.

The petition for rehearing is denied.