From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State ex rel. Williams v. Sutula

Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA
Nov 30, 2012
2012 Ohio 5704 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. 98827

11-30-2012

STATE OF OHIO EX REL. WILLIS F. WILLIAMS RELATOR v. HONORABLE JOHN D. SUTULA RESPONDENT

FOR RELATOR Willis F. Williams, pro se ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT Timothy J. McGinty Cuyahoga County Prosecutor BY: James E. Moss Assistant County Prosecutor


JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION


JUDGMENT:

WRIT DENIED

Writ of Procedendo

Motion No. 459576

Order No. 460140

FOR RELATOR

Willis F. Williams, pro se

ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT

Timothy J. McGinty
Cuyahoga County Prosecutor
BY: James E. Moss
Assistant County Prosecutor
MARY J. BOYLE, J.:

{¶1} Willis F. Williams has filed a complaint for a writ of procedendo. Williams seeks an order from this court that requires Judge John D. Sutula to render rulings with regard to a "motion for leave to file delayed motion for new trial pursuant to Ohio Criminal Rule 33(B)" and a "motion for leave to file supplemental authority and to supplement the record instanter" as filed in State v. Williams, Cuyahoga C.P. No. CR-048025. Judge Sutula has filed a motion for summary judgment, which is granted.

{¶2} Williams's request for a writ of procedendo is moot. Attached to the motion for summary judgment is a copy of a judgment entry, as journalized on October 17, 2012, which demonstrates that Williams's "motion for leave to file delayed motion for new trial pursuant to Ohio Criminal Rule 33(B)" and a "motion for leave to file supplemental authority and to supplement the record instanter" were denied. State ex rel. Jerninghan v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas, 74 Ohio St.3d 278, 1996-Ohio-117, 658 N.E.2d 723; State ex rel. Snider v. Stapleton, 65 Ohio St.3d 40, 600 N.E.2d 240 (1992); State ex rel. Richard v. Wells, 64 Ohio St.3d 76, 591 N.E.2d 1240 (1992); State ex rel. Gantt v. Coleman, 6 Ohio St.3d 5, 450 N.E.2d 1163 (1983).

{¶3} Accordingly, we grant the motion for summary judgment. Judge Sutula to pay costs. Costs ordered waived. The court directs the clerk of the court to serve all parties with notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal as required by Civ.R. 58(B).

{¶4} Writ denied. MARY J. BOYLE, JUDGE PATRICIA ANN BLACKMON, A.J., and
COLLEEN CONWAY COONEY, J., CONCUR


Summaries of

State ex rel. Williams v. Sutula

Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA
Nov 30, 2012
2012 Ohio 5704 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

State ex rel. Williams v. Sutula

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OHIO EX REL. WILLIS F. WILLIAMS RELATOR v. HONORABLE JOHN D…

Court:Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA

Date published: Nov 30, 2012

Citations

2012 Ohio 5704 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012)