From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State ex rel. Williams v. State

Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Oct 9, 2017
227 So. 3d 280 (La. 2017)

Opinion

No. 2016-KH-2206.

10-09-2017

STATE EX REL. Samuel L. WILLIAMS v. STATE of Louisiana


ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ORLEANS

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator fails to show he received ineffective assistance of counsel under the standard of Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).

Relator has now fully litigated two applications for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, see 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.


Summaries of

State ex rel. Williams v. State

Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Oct 9, 2017
227 So. 3d 280 (La. 2017)
Case details for

State ex rel. Williams v. State

Case Details

Full title:STATE EX REL. Samuel L. WILLIAMS v. STATE of Louisiana

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Date published: Oct 9, 2017

Citations

227 So. 3d 280 (La. 2017)

Citing Cases

Williams v. Hooper

Williams filed a pro se § 2254 application on November 20, 2017, asking that the limitations period be tolled…