From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State ex Rel. White v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth

Supreme Court of Ohio
Mar 5, 2003
98 Ohio St. 3d 290 (Ohio 2003)

Opinion

No. 2002-1673.

Submitted January 7, 2003.

Decided March 5, 2003.

Appeal from the Court of Appeals for Allen County, No. 1-02-60.

Michael Turner White, pro se.

Jim Petro, Attorney General, and Scott M. Campbell, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.


{¶ 1} In April 2002, the Ohio Parole Board denied parole to appellant, Michael Turner White, and continued his next parole eligibility date to April 2004.

{¶ 2} In July 2002, White filed a petition in the Court of Appeals for Allen County requesting a writ of mandamus to compel appellee, Ohio Adult Parole Authority ("APA"), to grant him, inter alia, parole and release him from prison. The APA filed a motion to dismiss the petition. In September 2002, the court of appeals granted the APA's motion and dismissed the petition.

{¶ 3} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. The primary objective of White's mandamus claim was to obtain an immediate release from custody. "But habeas corpus, rather than mandamus, is the proper action through which to seek release from prison or other physical confinement." State ex rel. Borden v. Hendon, 96 Ohio St.3d 64, 2002-Ohio-3525, 771 N.E.2d 247, at ¶ 7. And White "has no inherent or constitutional right to be released prior to the expiration of his sentence." Rollins v. Haviland (2001), 93 Ohio St.3d 590, 590, 757 N.E.2d 769.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook, Lundberg Stratton and O'Connor, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State ex Rel. White v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth

Supreme Court of Ohio
Mar 5, 2003
98 Ohio St. 3d 290 (Ohio 2003)
Case details for

State ex Rel. White v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth

Case Details

Full title:State ex rel. White, Appellant v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority, Appellee

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Mar 5, 2003

Citations

98 Ohio St. 3d 290 (Ohio 2003)
783 N.E.2d 900

Citing Cases

Hunt v. Sheldon

"`[H]abeas corpus is proper in the criminal context only if the petitioner is entitled to immediate release…

State v. Plassman

Appellant has other avenues by which he could raise this issue. See Houston v. Wilkinson (2001), 93 Ohio…