From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State ex Rel. Vornholt v. Ohio Dept. of Transp

Supreme Court of Ohio
May 4, 1999
709 N.E.2d 508 (Ohio 1999)

Opinion

No. 99-282.

May 4, 1999.

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus.


On April 7, 1999, the court granted an alternative writ and issued a schedule for filing of the evidence and briefs. It appears from the records of this court that relators have not filed evidence, due April 27, 1999, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore have failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed sua sponte for want of prosecution pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. X(11). See State ex rel. SuperAmerica Group v. Licking Cty. Bd. of Elections (1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 182, 183, 685 N.E.2d 507, 505.

MOTION DOCKET


Summaries of

State ex Rel. Vornholt v. Ohio Dept. of Transp

Supreme Court of Ohio
May 4, 1999
709 N.E.2d 508 (Ohio 1999)
Case details for

State ex Rel. Vornholt v. Ohio Dept. of Transp

Case Details

Full title:State ex rel. Vornholt v. Ohio Dept. of Transp

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: May 4, 1999

Citations

709 N.E.2d 508 (Ohio 1999)
85 Ohio St. 3d 1470

Citing Cases

State ex Rel. Crossman v. Greene County Bd.

(Emphasis added.) See, also, SuperAmerica, 80 Ohio St.3d at 183, 685 N.E.2d at 508; State ex rel. Vornholt v.…